Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Next »

Country’s healthcare system in a nutshell

The Swedish healthcare system is decentralised: the 21 regions are responsible for care provision and can decide whether to contract public or private providers. The system is publicly funded, covering all the people resident in Sweden, regardless of their nationality. 85% of its financing originates from regional taxes, complemented by direct federal government transfers.

It is structured into three administrative tiers (eHealth in Sweden, n.d.):

  • The national government establishes health and medical care principles and guidelines, setting policy priorities through laws, ordinances, or agreements with the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SKR)

  • The 21 regions organize health and medical care to ensure universal access.

  • The 290 municipalities handle care for the elderly, individuals with physical and mental disabilities, post-therapy support, and school health care.

Swedish eHealth Agency, a government entity, is dedicated to digitalizing and enhancing the exchange of information among patients, the healthcare system, and pharmacies within the country.

The agency provides various e-health services and digital solutions for individuals and professionals in healthcare and social services. Its e-prescription service and Covid certificates service have gained widespread recognition. Functioning as the coordinator of the government's e-health initiatives, the agency also monitors advancements in the e-health sector on national and international scales.

Its responsibilities are:

  • carrying out the government's e-health initiatives,

  • storing digital prescriptions from doctors and forwarding them to pharmacies,

  • It offers a Medicine Check service that allows patients to view information about their prescriptions, and view whether they are eligible for the high-cost protection card (if patients receive this, they don’t pay for medicines for a set period),

  • collecting information about the quantities of and which medicines have been sold in Sweden,

  • offering the Electronic Expert Support service to help pharmacies check whether prescription medicines work together. 

(Welcome to the Swedish eHealth Agency, n.d.)

 Public vs private

Health care spending by country in 2021 (12).svg

The national PHR

History

Journalen is the national PHR in Sweden . This is defined in the country as a Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record (PAEHR), and can be accessed via the national health care portal 1177.se. Journalen integrates EHR information from diverse systems used across Swedish healthcare organisations through a national health information exchange platform. The first region connected to the national infrastructure in 2012, and all of the others followed, with the last one connected in 2018 (Hägglund, Scandurra 2022).

The national patient portal, 1177.se, serves as a comprehensive healthcare access point, connecting to all EHR systems across the 21 regions. Utilizing a national e-ID for authentication, users gain access to administrative services and the PAEHR Journalen. Despite regional autonomy in prioritizing eHealth services, the national eHealth strategy mandates a unified online healthcare access point. The portal operates on a national health information exchange (HIE) platform, enabling access to data stored in any of the EHR systems.

The 1177.se portal offers three key components: a telephone advice service (1177 on the phone), a web-based information platform (1177.se on the web), and personalized eHealth services (1177.se personal eHealth services) accessible through authentication. The latter is the patient portal with functionality varying based on region or healthcare provider (Hägglund, Blease & Scandurra, 2020).

The Swedish government, in collaboration with the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR), has formulated a vision for the national e-Health strategy. By 2025, the goal is to establish Sweden as a global leader in leveraging digitization and eHealth for improved health and welfare, fostering independence.

eHealth is deeply integrated into Sweden's healthcare sector, with annual investments of around $1.22 billion in healthcare IT across all regions. Electronic health record solutions are universally adopted, with 99 percent of prescriptions issued electronically. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated the growth of digital health services, with digital consultations doubling in 2020, representing 11 percent of total medical appointments (International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2023).

Inera AB, a company owned by the Swedish regional governments, manages the national patient portal 1177.se, including the PAEHR Journalen (Cijvat, Cornet and Hägglund, 2021).

Features

Note from the author: the bibliography for this section is from 2018. We weren’t able to find more up-to-date information, but if you have access to them, please contact us.

Within PAEHR, patients can find:

  • medical notes from the EHRs (from all health care professions and all connected health care providers who have agreed to give access, both public and private),

  • list of prescribed medications,

  • lab results,

  • warnings,

  • diagnosis,

  • maternity care records,

  • referrals,

  • vaccinations

  • In some of the regions, users have access to a log function, to see whoever has accessed their record.

(Moll et al., 2018)

Challenges and areas for improvement

Data Fragmentation: despite the existence of the national 1177 patient portal in Sweden, the country employs various Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. To address the challenge of consolidating EHR data for patients, Sweden has implemented a national Health Information Exchange (HIE) platform, however, challenges persist in achieving a comprehensive overview of health data. Variability in information accessibility among care providers, influenced by differing policies and regulations, contributes to a fragmented patient view based on the location, timing, and purpose of seeking treatment. This is closely related to the difficulty of agreeing on a national regulatory framework for patients’ direct access to their health information.

Another challenge has been change resistance from healthcare professionals: healthcare professionals have expressed resistance to how introducing this system might change their work. Concerns include potential increases in workload, with fears that more time may be spent explaining EHR contents and addressing patient inquiries. Some professionals worry that EHRs could lead to conflicts, misunderstandings, and misinterpretations, causing unnecessary worry among patients. However, experience with e-services over time tends to alleviate these concerns, with healthcare professionals who actively use the system expressing fewer worries (Hägglund, 2017).

In a 2022 survey on the usability of the Swedish Personal Health Record, the primary concerns raised were:

  • Due to regional adaptations of the national regulatory framework for Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record (PAEHR), different regions offer distinct features and present varying health information to patients.

  • Several regions did not retroactively provide information; the records only included data from the date the region launched the portal.

  • Many regions imposed restrictions on patient data availability in specific clinical areas, such as mental health. Some respondents perceived discrimination due to the limited access to their mental health-related data.

  • When a child turns 13, parents automatically lose access to their record. However, the child cannot access their record until they turn 16, resulting in a three-year gap with no access to the record.

  • The platform lacks a messaging feature that could allow patients and professionals to communicate with each other remotely.

(Hägglund and Scandurra, 2022)

The following table, from Cijvat, Cornet and Hägglund, 2021 (Table 4), shows “Barriers on the local implementation level”

Category

Sweden

Netherlands

Systems and suppliers

Technical limitations of systems

High costs for connecting small EHR systems

Testing prior to implementation necessary

Difficult requisites for connecting to the HIE

Limitations in choice and possibilities of systems

Large dependency on software suppliers

Alignmentof systems necessary but difficult

Systems and suppliers determine achievement of VIPP (VIPP programme is an initiative in the Netherlands designed to enhance the exchange of information between patients and healthcare professional)

Social and organisational

Resistance and fears from physicians

Changing HCPs' routines, workflows and attitudes

Physicians' reluctance, resistance and fears

CHanging HCPs' political status and workflow

Effects on hospitals' culture and work processes

Fears for patients' confusion, questions, fears

Gradual implementation necessary to keep physicians on board

Resources

High costs for connecting to HIE

Time-consuming decision making due to flexibility in NRF

VIPP requires a lot of human work

Human work leads to high costs

Too little time to make VIPP’s deadlines

Policies, laws and regulations

Some VIPP goals are difficult to accomplish

Strict privacy regulations not in patiants' interests

Strict security rules impede user-friendliness

Governance

Gradual approach necessary to get all stakeholders on board

Flexibility in choosing EHR systems in some countries but only one supported

Gradual implementation to keep physicians on board

VIPP has no or low priority

The following table, from Cijvat, Cornet and Hägglund, 2021 (Table 3), shows “Barriers on the national level”

Category

Sweden

The Netherlands

Systems and suppliers

Authentication methods

Difficulties in measuring hospitals' progress

Social and organisational

Resistance and fears from physicians

-

Resources

Financing the development of Journalen

Too little time to take precautions for physicians' resistance

-

Policies, laws and regulations

Include electable rules to make progress

Electable rules caused confusion and inequality for users

Givinc patients direct on line access to record was illegal when the PAEHR Journalen was first introduced in 2002

Challenging to define goals adequately for desired outcomes

Challenging to estimate reasonable usage percentages

Slow development of other national programs

Effects of barriers

Delays

Restrictions on information that is diplayed

Delays

Published outcomes - statistics

Unfortunately, we couldn’t find any statistics about the use of the Swedish PHR. If you have access to this information or can put us in touch with someone who has, please contact us at book@patientsknowbest.com

Screenshots

Unfortunately, we couldn’t find any screenshots of the Swedish PHR. If you have access to this information or can put us in touch with someone who has, please contact us at book@patientsknowbest.com

Bibliography

Cijvat, C.D., Cornet, R. and Hägglund, M., 2021. Factors influencing development and implementation of patients' access to electronic health records—a comparative study of Sweden and the Netherlands. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, p.621210. (online) Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.621210/full (Accessed 3 May 2023).

eHealth in Sweden, n.d. GNIUS. Edited by Délégation au numérique en santé (Ministerial delegation for Digital Health). Available at: https://gnius.esante.gouv.fr/en/international-digital-health-systems/ehealth-in-sweden (Accessed 3 May 2023).

Hägglund, M., 2017. Electronic health records in Sweden—how can we go from transparency to collaboration? Thebmjopinion. (online) 23 June. Available at: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/06/23/maria-hagglund-electronic-health-records-in-sweden-how-can-we-go-transparency-to-collaboration/ (Accessed 2 August 2024).

Hägglund, M., 2020. Mobile access and adoption of the Swedish National Patient Portal. In: A. Värri et al., eds. Integrated Citizen Centered Digital Health and Social Care. The European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) and IOS Press. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1509909/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Accessed 3 May 2023). doi:10.3233/SHTI200699.

Hägglund, M. and Scandurra, I., 2022. Usability of the Swedish accessible electronic health record: qualitative survey study. JMIR Human Factors, 9(2), p.e37192. (online) Available at: https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2022/2/e37192 (Accessed 3 May 2023).

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2023. Sweden - Country Commercial Guide. (online) Available at: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/sweden-ehealth (Accessed 3 May 2023).

Moll, J., Rexhepi, H., Cajander, Å., Grünloh, C., Huvila, I., Hägglund, M., Myreteg, G., Scandurra, I. and Åhlfeldt, R.M., 2018. Patients’ experiences of accessing their electronic health records: national patient survey in Sweden. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(11), p.e278. (online) Available at: https://www.jmir.org/2018/11/e278/ (Accessed 3 May 2023).

Welcome to the Swedish eHealth Agency, n.d. eHälsomyndigheten. Available at: https://www.ehalsomyndigheten.se/languages/english/welcome-to-the-swedish-ehealth-agency/ (Accessed 3 May 2023).

  • No labels